Drawing for MEGA CAPS

USPTO serial 79024152

MEGA CAPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3329629Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2007
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGA CAPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPONE CHASE ROADLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietetic foods adapted for medical use, namely fortifying foodstuffs containing parapharmaceutical preparations for prophylactic use and for convalescents.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
029Concentrates of whey protein, soy protein, egg protein and foodstuffs with a high protein content enriched with vitamins, mineral salts and amino acids, namely protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars and high protein powders for nutritional purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Glucidic concentrates, namely, glucose for nutritional purposes for use in instant drinks and powders, and foodstuffs with high energy content enriched with vitamins and mineral salts and glucidic concentrates for nutritional purposes, namely grain-based and granola-based and cereal- based energy snack barsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 20, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 25, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 16, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 21, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Nov 21, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 6, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2010COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Feb 4, 2010PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2010LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance