USPTO serial 79024168
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N 3RD FLNAPLES, FL 34103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods adapted for medical use, namely, tube feed for children one to six; baby food, namely, tube feed for children one to six | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |