USPTO serial 79024184
SUMMIT PARTNERS SUBORDINATED DEBT FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3312766Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SUMMIT PARTNERS SUBORDINATED DEBT FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica L. Rothstein
Jessica L. Rothstein Goodwin Procter LLP620 Eighth AvenueNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial and investment services, except those provided by traditional consumer banking institutions, namely providing private equity and venture capital investment funds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Summit Partners LP
- Other trademarks owned by Summit Partners LP
- Other trademarks owned by Summit Partners LP
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SUMMIT PARTNERS SUBORDINATED DEBT FUND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |