Drawing for KT . COLOR

USPTO serial 79024193

KT . COLOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3294214Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 18, 2007
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with KT . COLOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Weissman

Peter Weissman Blank Rome LLP1825 Eye Street NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Paints, varnishes [, lacquers ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 13, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 20, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 7, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 7, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 7, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 7, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 7, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 17, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 18, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance