USPTO serial 79024217
LAFIORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3505412Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAFIORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
E-07193 S'ESGLEIETA (PALMA DE MALLORCA), ES
E-07193 S'ESGLEIETA (PALMA DE MALLORCA), ES
E-07193 S'ESGLEIETA (PALMA DE MALLORCA), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P. LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Fashion jewelry and jewelry articles, namely, beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry, bracelets, bronze jewelry, brooches, charms, costume jewelry, jade, jewelry caskets, chains, jewelry findings, jewelry for the head, jewelry pins for use on hats, jewelry ring holders, jewelry to be affixed to bikinis, amulets, crosses, watches made of precious metals, precious metal plated leaves and flowers, lapel pins, leather jewelry and accessory boxes, pet jewelry, pins, rings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Beverage glassware; ceramic and artistic earthenware mugs, bowls and drinking jugs with a spout and handle; glass household utensils, namely, decorative figurines, decorative plates and cups, cups and plates, drinking glassware, pitchers, serving trays, decanters, decorative vases, jars with a long spout, candlesticks, salt cellars, bottles, jugs; containers for household and kitchen use; decorative glass; crystal beverage ware; enameled glass; painted beverage ware | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 24, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |