Drawing for NORAC

USPTO serial 79024252

NORAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453894Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

John H. Weber Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006fireproof interior wall, door and ceiling panels of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 8, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 21, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 30, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 27, 2007FAXXFAX SENT—
Mar 5, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance