Drawing for Serial No. 79024269

USPTO serial 79024269

Serial No. 79024269

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3213715Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2007
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with Serial No. 79024269?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Patel

Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Road making equipment, namely road rollers; earth moving machines, namely excavators; diggers machines, namely trench cutters; hydraulic pumps; elevating apparatus, namely work platforms; mechanical mixing machines; compressed air pumps for garage installations; railroad constructing machines, namely combination winch and bumpers, fairleads, and highway guardrail post drivers; concrete mixers machines; bulldozersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 6, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 30, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 30, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 30, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 19, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 25, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance