USPTO serial 79024395
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DE
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der; angewandten Forschung e.V.
DE
Other trademarks owned by Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der; angewandten Forschung e.V.
Agere Systems Deutschland GmbH & Co KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Agere Systems Deutschland GmbH & Co KG
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment, namely, data processors; computers; computer programs for the controlling of apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound, data and images; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound, data and images; electronic sound systems, consisting of controlling devices equipped with technology for the processing and decoding of acoustic signals, loudspeakers, power amplifiers, image reproduction apparatus and electronic display screens; loud speaker systems consisting of loudspeakers, loudspeaker drivers, balancers, amplifiers, equalizers and control devices therefor; recording carriers or data carriers for storage, namely, optical and binary semiconductor storages in the nature of DVDs, CDs, tape, and silicon devices for storing music, spoken word performances, and video, and images. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing access to telecommunications networks; broadcasting TV programs and radio programs; news and image transmission by means of computers; communication by fibre-optical networks, transmission of news. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Digital data rendering and data processing, namely, conversion and transfer of digital data to tangible media; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for the control of data networks, for the integration of data networks of data networks; computer consultation services; services of an electronic data programmer (EDP), namely programming of electronic data processing software; technical consultancy in the field of electronic data processing (EDP); computer hardware and software consultation; maintenance and installation of software; development of computer hardware and software, in particular for apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound, data or images; developing computer hardware for electronic game paddles; developing computer hardware for electronic sound systems, in particular for sound systems consisting of loudspeakers, loudspeaker drivers, balancing apparatus, amplifiers, equalizers and/or control apparatus; developing computer hardware for loudspeaker drivers, loudspeakers and display screens; developing computer hardware for computer games. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |