Drawing for E3

USPTO serial 79024469

E3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooking apparatuses, included in this class, namely commercial cooking ovens, domestic cooking ovens and microwave ovens for cooking; rotisseries and electric roasters and roasters powered by propane gas or natural gas; electric grills; gas grills; electric grills and gas grills, namely gyros grills, doner grills and kebab grillsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance