Drawing for ROCKCABLE

USPTO serial 79024495

ROCKCABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223363Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKCABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark D. Gross

CLARK D. GROSS LAW OFFICES OF CLARK D. GROSS1800 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Amplifiers, loudspeaker boxes, ] electrical socket connectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
015[ Electric guitars and electric bass guitars ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 10, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 28, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 12, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 19, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance