USPTO serial 79024531
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
AUMUND-Fördererbau; GmbH & Co. KG
47495 Rheinberg, DE
AUMUND-Fördererbau; GmbH & Co. KG
47495 Rheinberg, DE
AUMUND-Fördererbau; GmbH & Co. KG
47495 Rheinberg, DE
DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer S. Stachniak
Jennifer S. Stachniak Johnson, Marcou & Isaacs, LLC27 City Square, Suite 1Hoschton, GA 30548UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial machines, namely, apron feeders, heavy-duty apron feeders, deep drawn pan conveyors, bucket apron conveyors, pivoting pan conveyors, drag chain conveyors, mobile link conveyors, flat plate conveyors, short plate conveyors, belt bucket elevators, central chain bucket elevators, double bucket elevators, bucket elevators with gravity discharge, pendulum bucket elevators for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk materials; machines and mechanical apparatus for conveying and evacuating bulk materials from bulk material bins and silos, namely, rotary discharged machines and systems for tipping wagons comprised of front tippers, rotary tippers and side tippers; industrial machines, apparatus, and parts therefor for emptying bunkers, silos and large storage rooms as well as for loosening bulk material stored therein, namely, rotating gravity discharge gates, grab unloading hoppers, armored chain conveyors, cleaning conveyors, telescopic loading spouts, stockyards and blending bed systems, bridge-type scraper reclaimers, portal- and semi portal scraper reclaimers, multiple purpose portal bridge reclaimers, cantilever scraper reclaimers, combined stacker/scraper reclaimers, circular storages with stacker and cantilever reclaimers or bridge-type scraper reclaimers; chain conveyors and conveyors for hot material; belt conveyor systems consisting of steel plate conveyors and conveyors of different construction, belt conveyors; vertical and pendulum bucket conveyors incorporating supporting constructions in the form of belt bridges and delivery towers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Dosage apparatus and machines for measuring bulk material, namely, apron weight feeders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Cars for emptying bunkers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Product development, namely, technical planning, development, projecting and designing of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, wiping off, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; engineering services, namely, technical analysis services and technical survey on the field of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; technical consulting relating to product research and development in the field of engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |