Drawing for BEATSCOPE

USPTO serial 79024571

BEATSCOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340152Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEATSCOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Ave., Suite 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment, namely computers for blood pressure measurement, wave form analysis, and beat to beat cardiovascular monitoring; computer programs for blood pressure measurement, wave form analysis, and beat to beat cardiovascular monitoring.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Technological consultation in the technology field of blood pressure measurement, wave form analysis, and beat to beat cardiovascular monitoring; scientific research; consultancy in the field of software design; design and development of softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 10, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Sep 3, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 18, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance