USPTO serial 79024581
ECO.KID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3699011Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2009
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO.KID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Peterson
Jeffrey D. Peterson Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Antiperspirants and deodorants; essential oils for personal use; hair colorants, hair dyes, hair lotions, hair shampoo and conditioner; non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes, hair spray, hair gels, hair creams and hair waxes; cosmetic preparations for baths, namely, body wash and bath foam; laundry bleach; color brightening chemicals for household laundry purposes, namely, fabric brighteners and stain removers; fabric softeners for laundry use; laundry preparations, namely, liquid laundry detergent; laundry soaking preparations, namely, laundry pre-soak; cosmetic creams; greases for cosmetic purposes; lotions for skin care and preparations for skin care, namely, cleansers, moisturizers, body balm; protectants, namely, cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; tissues impregnanted with cosmetic lotions; medicated soap, soap, cakes of soap, disinfectant soap; sunscreen preparations; non-medicated toiletries; make-up removing preparations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 20, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |