USPTO serial 79024599
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
JOSEPH D. LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Ball taps, for use in heating, cooling and air conditioning machines and systems for use in the heating, cooling and air conditioning industries; ball taps for use in plumbing installations; valves, namely, pump control valves; servo valves; valves for pumps; ball valves being parts of machines; ] valves being parts of heating and cooling machines; valves being parts of heating [, ] * and * cooling [ and air conditioning machines and ] systems; valves, being parts of plumbing installations and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automatic valves; [ pressure relief valves for use with heating, cooling and air conditioning systems; electronic valves and ] control valves for adjusting, control and metering of the flow of [ gases and ] liquids in heating [, ] *and * cooling [ and air conditioning ] systems; electric and electronic control devices for heating and energy management; [ electric and electronic electro-mechanical automatic liquid flow and liquid level control machines and instruments for use on distributing valves for heating ; electric and electronic electro-mechanical pressure control machines and instruments for use on distributing valves for heating; climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, air conditioning, heating, ventilation and drying control devices ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Pressurizing valves, pressurizing valves with integrated flow meters, metered valves with integrated flow meters, valves for the distribution of fluids [ and gases ], all for use as parts of heating, cooling, [ air conditioning ] and plumbing installations; plumbing fittings, namely, valves; [ ball taps, namely, ball cocks and ] ball valves being parts of heating, cooling, [ air conditioning ] and plumbing installations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |