Drawing for MARKASI

USPTO serial 79024639

MARKASI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3218319Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 13, 2007
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARKASI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, pullovers, skirts, dresses, blouses, jeans, trousers, jackets, coats, raincoats, anoraks, sportswear, namely, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts; beach clothes, namely, shorts, knitwear, namely, pullovers, sweaters, sweatshirts, jackets, berets, shawls; overalls, underclothing, namely, bodices, brassieres, camisoles and underpants; dressing gowns, bath robes, bathing suits, pajamas, gloves, ski suits; headgear, namely, hats, caps, knitted caps, berets; footwear, namely, shoes not orthopaedic shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, beach shoes, athletic shoes, lace boots and parts thereof, shoe parts, namely, heel pieces, heels, footwear uppers; stockings; belts; ties, neckties, shawls, scarves, neck scarves, sarongs, collars for dresses, muffs, wristbands, suspenders, braces for clothing, garters, bandanas, headbands; clothing for babies, namely, babies' diapers of textileSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2021IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 23, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 24, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Sep 24, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 24, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 24, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance