Drawing for LINEAR-MECH

USPTO serial 79024644

LINEAR-MECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3382057Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2008
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LINEAR-MECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Stern

Steven Stern STERN & SCHURIN LLP595 STEWART AVENUE, SUITE 510GARDEN CITY, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electro-mechanical apparatus and other apparatus and instruments, namely linear actuators and power operated screw jacks; Lift apparatus, namely, power operated screw jacks; Engines and motors, none being for land vehicles; Speed governors and reducers for engines and motors, not for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 29, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 12, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Nov 12, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 12, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 30, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 17, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 29, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance