USPTO serial 79024651
Serial No. 79024651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3288346Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79024651?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edna M. O'Connor
Edna M. O'Connor TERUMO BCT, Inc.10811 West Collins AvenueIP DepartmentLakewood, CO 80215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Apparatus for extracting one or more components from a composite liquid, namely blood or buffy coat or bone marrow or umbilical cord blood, comprising an aqueous component, namely plasma or an anticoagulant solution or a storage solution for blood cells, and one or more cellular components, namely platelets, white blood cells or red blood cells or stem cells; Apparatus for extracting stem cells from bone marrow; Apparatus for extracting plasma, platelets, white blood cells or red blood cells from blood or a blood fraction; Blood washing apparatus; Centrifuge for the separation of an aqueous component, namely plasma or an anticoagulant solution or a storage solution for blood cells, and one or more cellular components, namely platelets or white blood cells or red blood cells or stem cells, from a composite liquid, namely blood or buffy coat or bone marrow or umbilical cord blood; centrifuge for the separation of plasma, platelets, white blood cells or red blood cells from blood or a blood fraction; Accessories for use with such apparatuses and centrifuges, namely-- filter for filtering a composite liquid, namely blood or buffy coat, or a component of said composite liquid; filter for filtering blood or a blood product; Filter for removing white blood cells from blood or a blood product; collection bag for receiving blood from a donor; separation bag for containing a composite liquid, namely blood or buffy coat or bone marrow or umbilical cord blood, comprising an aqueous component, namely plasma or an anticoagulant solution or a storage solution for blood cells, and one or more cellular components, namely platelets or white blood cells or red blood cells or stem cells, to be separated; circular separation bag for a composite liquid, namely blood or buffy coat or bone marrow or umbilical cord blood; blood product bag for containing plasma, platelets, white blood cells or red blood cells; separation set comprising a separation bag for containing a composite liquid, namely blood or buffy coat or bone marrow or umbilical cord blood; connected to one or more bags for containing one or more components to be extracted from said composite liquid; bag for containing an additive solution for platelets; bag for containing an anti-coagulant solution; Bag for containing a storage solution for red blood cells or white blood cells; blood tubing set comprising blood tubing lines, blood bags, blood access needles and solution bags | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GAMBRO Inc
- Other trademarks owned by GAMBRO Inc
- Other trademarks owned by GAMBRO BCT, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GAMBRO BCT, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Terumo BCT, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |