Drawing for RP REAL PRECIOUS QUALITY

USPTO serial 79024674

RP REAL PRECIOUS QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3476730Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2008
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RP REAL PRECIOUS QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis H. Cavanaugh

DENNIS H. CAVANAUGH D H CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES555 5TH AVE FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10017-9254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, picture frames, decorative and sacred pictures, boxes, gift and fancy goods for children, namely, necklaces, rings, bracelets, pendants, chains, pins and earrings; plates of precious metal; jewelry; raw materials, namely, bars, bullions, and ingots all of precious metal; necklaces, locks for necklaces, rings, bracelets, pendants, chains, pins and earrings; jewelry; precious stones; horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 17, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 31, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 31, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 30, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 1, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 1, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance