Drawing for SÜDTIROL SPECK ALTO ADIGE I.G.P. SÜDTIROLER SPECK G.G.A. INDICAZIONE GEOGRAFICA PROTETTA GESCHÜTZTE GEOGRAPHISCHE ANGABE

USPTO serial 79024724

SÜDTIROL SPECK ALTO ADIGE I.G.P. SÜDTIROLER SPECK G.G.A. INDICAZIONE GEOGRAFICA PROTETTA GESCHÜTZTE GEOGRAPHISCHE ANGABE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SÜDTIROL SPECK ALTO ADIGE I.G.P. SÜDTIROLER SPECK G.G.A. INDICAZIONE GEOGRAFICA PROTETTA GESCHÜTZTE GEOGRAPHISCHE ANGABE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Pork, sliced or whole pieces, namely pickled, smoked and dried; pickled, smoked and dried pork, namely speck, bacon, ham (prosciutto)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 21, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance