USPTO serial 79024744
HUMAN MED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298241Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HUMAN MED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |