USPTO serial 79024754
BRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275437Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Bourque
Daniel J. Bourque Bourque & Associates, P.A.835 Hanover StreetManchester, NH 03104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, * for personal hygiene and body care; * perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, deodorants for personal use, perfume spray, included in this class, eau de toilette, shampoos, lotions, namely, body lotion and sun tanning lotion, hair-care preparations, bath salts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelery, precious stones, horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Products of leather and imitations of leather, namely, suitcases, bags, garment bags, attaché cases, briefcases, wallets, purses and rucksacks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Articles of clothing, namely, pants, shorts, skirts, overalls, dresses, shirts, T-shirts, pullovers, sweaters, vests, jackets, coats, undergarments, gloves, scarves, bandannas, socks, shoes, belts, hats and caps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leineweber GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Leineweber GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Leineweber GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BRAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |