Drawing for ILLEXAO

USPTO serial 79024767

ILLEXAO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318513Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ILLEXAO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

David Ehrlich Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible vegetable oils and fats for foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 28, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Feb 2, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 22, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jul 8, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 8, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 8, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jul 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance