Drawing for VKD DUAL BLOCK

USPTO serial 79024804

VKD DUAL BLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340157Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with VKD DUAL BLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo M. Loughlin

Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc901 New York Avenue, NWSuite 900 EastWASHINGTON, DC 20001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Ball valves, two ways, three ways [ and non-spring return ] type, equipped with anti-unscrewing and block device for union nuts and anti-unscrewing and block device for union nuts of ball valves, two ways, three ways [ and non-spring return ] type, used as parts of machinesACTIVE—
011Ball valves, two ways, three ways [ and non-spring return ] type, equipped with anti-unscrewing and block device for union nuts and anti-unscrewing and block device for union nuts of ball valves, two ways, three ways [ and non-spring return ] type, used as parts of heating, sanitary and water supply installationsACTIVE—
017Thermoplastic materials sold in sheet form, rods, blocks and other stock shapes produced by injection moulding or extrusion technologies and used for manufacturing plastic parts of ball valves, two ways, three ways [ and non-spring return ] type, equipped with anti-unscrewing and block device for union nuts and anti-unscrewing and block device for union nuts of ball valves,two ways, three ways [ and non-spring return ] typeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 10, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 6, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Oct 6, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 19, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 17, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 13, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 13, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 25, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 27, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 26, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance