Drawing for RINIVA

USPTO serial 79024894

RINIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233720Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RINIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner, Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of central or peripheral nervous system diseases, heart and circulatory diseases, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, urological diseases, gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic diseases, chronic peripheral arterial occlusive diseases, inflammatory diseases, antiallergic preparations, sold by prescription only, and analgesic preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 4, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 29, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 1, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance