USPTO serial 79024898
Y.NITTA.SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4040232Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2011
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Y.NITTA.SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo, 116-0002, JP
Tokyo, 116-0002, JP
Tokyo, 116-0002, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, namely, Hand soap, Body soap, Bath soap, Skin soap, Laundry soap, and Liquid soap; face powder, namely, face powder on paper, Creamy powder, Facial-care powder, Facial-care powder paste; skin lotions, namely, Skin lotion, Milky lotion, Hand lotion, Shaving lotion, Facial lotion; creams, namely, Cleansing cream, Cold cream, Vanishing cream, Hand cream, Shaving cream, Sun tan cream, Sun screen, Bleaching cream, Foundation cream, Lip cream; Lip stick, Paste Blush, Cheek Blush; hair care preparations, namely, Oil conditioner, Color hair rinse, Setting lotion, Hair dye, Permanent wave preparations, Hair-style fixing oil, Hair Shampoo, Hair conditioner, Hair cream, Hair tonic, Hair fixer, Hair lacquer, Pomade; fragrances, namely, Eau de cologne, Perfume paste, Perfume powder, and fragrances for personal use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Bags, namely, briefcase-type portfolio, Shoulder bag, Briefcase, Suitcase, Handbag, Traveling bag, Backpack, Leather Bags, namely, leather briefcase-type portfolio, leather shoulder bag, leather briefcase, leather suitcase, leather handbag, leather traveling bag, leather backpack, Leather cases, namely, leather key cases, leather purses, leather card cases, leather coin cases; Travel umbrella, All-purpose umbrella, Beach umbrella, Leather Umbrella bag | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |