USPTO serial 79024905
BIBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail services with respect to clothing, footwear, headgear, eyeglasses and sunglasses, appliances for recordal, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, photographic, film and optical apparatus and instruments, jewellery, fashion jewellery, precious stones, watches, goods made of leather and imitations of leather, as far as contained in class 18, namely bags and other cases not adapted to the products they are intended to contain as well as small articles of leather, in particular purses, pocket wallets, key cases, trunks and travelling bags, umbrellas, parasols, perfumeries, cosmetics and body care products, furniture, mirrors, picture frames, goods made of wood, reed, cork, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, as far as contained in class 20, household or kitchen utensils and containers (not of precious metal or coated therewith), yarns and threads for textile use, textiles and textile goods, as far as contained in class 24, bed and table covers, laces and embroideries, ribbons and braids, buttons, hooks and eyes, pins and needles, artificial flowers, carpets, rugs, mats and matting, wall hangings (non-textile), games, playthings, gymnastic and sporting articles, as far as contained in class 28, decorations for Christmas trees | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |