Drawing for BERMAQ, S.A.

USPTO serial 79024924

BERMAQ, S.A.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3206469Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2007
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERMAQ, S.A.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Computer Numerical Control milling machines; ] polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing plasticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 14, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 6, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 21, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 12, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 28, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance