Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79024943?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79024943. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns EMUGE FRANKEN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79024943, the listed owner(s) include: EMUGE-Werk Richard Glimpel; GmbH & Co KG Fabrik für; Präzisionswerkzeuge, EMUGE-Werk Richard Glimpel; GmbH & Co KG Fabrik für; Präzisionswerkzeuge, EMUGE-Werk Richard Glimpel; GmbH & Co KG Fabrik für; Präzisionswerkzeuge.

What is USPTO serial number 79024943?

Serial number 79024943 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark EMUGE FRANKEN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of EMUGE FRANKEN?

EMUGE FRANKEN (79024943) currently shows USPTO status code 706 on the public record. This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Which trademark classes cover EMUGE FRANKEN?

The public record lists International Classes: 007, 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 79024943

EMUGE FRANKEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3499209Status 706Registered

Filing date: Feb 10, 2006
Status date: Sep 13, 2018
Registration date: Sep 9, 2008
Examiner: BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EMUGE FRANKEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Frodsham

Michael J. Frodsham Workman Nydegger60 East South TempleSuite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Tools for use in machines, namely, dies, cutters, drills, drill bits, polishers, sanders, grinders and structural parts therefore, namely, dies, cutters, drills, drill bits, polishers, sanders, grinders; tools for use in machines for the cutting and forming of materials, namely, cutting tools, milling tools, drilling tools, thread-generating tools, screw thread-tapping tools, thread-milling tools, thread-forming tools; machine tool holders; machine tool components for machines for the treatment of materials, namely, for cutting tools, milling tools, drilling tools, thread-generating tools, screw thread-tapping tools, thread-milling tools, thread-forming tools	ACTIVE	—
009	Tool monitoring systems for machines and machine tools, in particular for machines and machine tools for the treatment of materials, namely, computer hardware; surveying machines and instruments for the surveying of machines and machine tools for the treatment of materials; gauges, namely, thread gauges, thread ring gauges, thread plug gauges	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 25, 2025	RNWL	INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED	—
Sep 13, 2018	NA71	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED	—
Sep 13, 2018	PRAN	POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED	—
Sep 13, 2018	71AG	REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED	—
Sep 7, 2018	71AF	REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED	—
Sep 7, 2018	ES75	TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED	—
Sep 9, 2017	REM4	COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED	—
Feb 25, 2016	RNWL	INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED	—
Sep 9, 2014	NA75	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED	—
Sep 9, 2014	C75A	REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	—
Sep 5, 2014	APRE	CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	—
Sep 1, 2014	ES75	TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED	—
Dec 29, 2012	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jan 6, 2009	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Jan 6, 2009	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
Dec 9, 2008	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Sep 9, 2008	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
May 20, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
May 20, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 29, 2008	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Apr 29, 2008	GNEN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 29, 2008	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 29, 2008	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Jan 10, 2008	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Dec 20, 2007	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Dec 20, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Dec 20, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2007	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Dec 4, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 4, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 4, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 25, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2007	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Nov 25, 2007	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 24, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 7, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 7, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Oct 11, 2006	IRRH	IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU	—
Aug 24, 2006	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Aug 11, 2006	IRRF	IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB	—
Aug 8, 2006	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Aug 8, 2006	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Aug 4, 2006	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Aug 3, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 24, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Jul 21, 2006	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—