Drawing for ARCOPLUS

USPTO serial 79024954

ARCOPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3362631Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2008
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCOPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Plastics semi finished products, namely polycarbonate panels for internal and external roofs, walls and ceilingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Non-metallic building materials, namely windows, window frames and roof coverings; polycarbonate sheets, namely modified sheet and colored sheet; polycarbonate and glass tilesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 16, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 3, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 3, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 1, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 24, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 14, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance