USPTO serial 79024963
SHINEZYME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298246Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHINEZYME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
EDWARD M PRINCE ALSTON & BIRD LLPTHE ATLANTIC BLDG 950 F ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Enzyme preparations for industrial use, namely, for use in the manufacture and formulation of home care cleaning products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |