Drawing for Serial No. 79024974

USPTO serial 79024974

Serial No. 79024974

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3392039Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 4, 2008
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79024974?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein Foley & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for accessing media through mobile devicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunications, namely, providing access to multimedia content through mobile devices in a wide variety of fieldsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Providing information, news and commentary in the field of entertainmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 28, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 12, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 26, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance