USPTO serial 79024980
YN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3602574Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- SAPP, HEATHER
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo, 116-0002, JP
Tokyo, 116-0002, JP
Tokyo, 116-0002, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, cosmetics, fragrances and perfumes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Shoulder bags, briefcases, suitcases, traveling bags, rucksacks, handbags, umbrellas, leather bags, leather cases, leather key cases, leather purses, leather card cases, and leather coin cases | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Evening dress, School uniforms, Jackets, Jogging pants, Sweat pants, Suits, Skirts, Sky jackets, Sky pants, pants, Socks, Coats, Overcoats, Cloaks, Raincoats, Sweaters, Dress Shirts, Nightwear, Underwear, Swimwear, Cardigans, vests, Dress shirts, Open-necked shirts, Sport shirts, Blouses, Polo shirts, Nightgowns, Negligees, Japanese robes, Pajamas, Bathrobes, Camisoles, Corsets, Undershirts, Petticoats, Slips, Panties, Briefs, Brassier, Swimming cap, Undergarments, foot wear,Aprons, Mufflers, Socks, Puttees, Fur stoles, Shawls, Gloves, Infants' cloth diapers, Neckties, Neckerchief, Bandanas, Ear warmers, Hoods, Bamboo Hats, Nightcaps, Helmets and Headgear, Garters, Sock Suspenders, Waistbands, Belts, Rain boots, Lace-up shoes, Training shoes, Overshoes, Clogs, Work shoes, Sandals, Low shoes, Fishing boots, Women's shoes, Winter shoes, Hosiery shoes, Canvas shoes, Infants' shoes insole, Heelpieces, Welts, Replaceable soles, Shoe Dowels, Pegs, Pull straps, Anoraks, Competition ski wear, Headband, Wind jackets, Uniforms, stockings, Wrist bands, Golf shoes, Soccer shoes, Ski boots, Gymnastics shoes, Tennis shoes, Climbing boots, Basketball shoes, Volleyball shoes, Handball shoes, Bowling shoes, Boxing shoes, Hockey shoes, Baseball shoes, Rugby shoes, Track and Field shoes, Horse riding boots | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NITTA Yuka
- Other trademarks owned by NITTA Yuka
- Other trademarks owned by NITTA Yuka
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named YN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |