USPTO serial 79025026
AGMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATRIN LEWERTOFF
KATRIN LEWERTOFF ARENT FOX LLP1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Universal joint shafts, universal joints, ball joints, overload and free engine clutches, all for machine driven agricultural implements and agricultural machines; gears and enclosed drives for industrial and agricultural machinery; replacement parts for the aforesaid goods; transmission gears for machines; couplings for connecting machine driven or non-mechanically driven agricultural implements to each other as well as constituent parts thereof, namely, coupling frames, lower links, upper links, coupling hooks, lateral struts, lateral stabilizers, spacers, lift links for lower links, ball guide cones; universal joint shaft couplers for connecting machine driven agricultural implements to each other; safety devices for universal joint shafts, gears and clutches for machine driven agricultural implements, namely, guard tubes, dimensionally stable guard shields, guard cones, protective covers; adjustable speed drives for industrial and agricultural machinery, drives for hydraulic pumps, electronic drives, hydraulic drives, hydrostatic drives, drives comprising universal joint shafts, clutches and gears, all aforesaid drives in particular for machine tools as well as for agricultural and construction machines; hydraulic pumps, hydraulic cylinders, hydraulic valves and hydraulic engines for machines, for machine tools as well as for agriculture and construction machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Universal joint shafts, universal joints, ball joints, overload and free engine clutches, gears, all for tractors; couplings for connecting tractors to machine driven or non-mechanically driven agricultural implements as well as constituent parts thereof, namely, coupling frames, lower links, upper links, coupling hooks, lateral struts, lateral stabilizers, spacers, lift links for lower links, ball guide cones; universal joint shaft couplers for connecting tractors to machine driven agricultural implements; safety devices for universal joint shafts, gears and clutches for tractors, namely, guard tubes, dimensionally stable guard shields, guard cones, protective covers; drive shafts for land vehicles, land vehicle parts, namely, drive gears, drive shafts, adjustable speed drives for vehicles, hydraulic drives for vehicles, hydrostatic drives for vehicles, drives comprising universal joint shafts, clutches and gearboxes, all aforesaid drives for tractors or for self-propelling agricultural and construction machines; tractor parts, namely, drive gears and drive shafts; hydraulic pumps, hydraulic cylinders, hydraulic valves and hydraulic engines for tractors, for self-propelling agricultural and construction machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |