USPTO serial 79025029
HATEMOGLU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HATEMOGLU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely underclothing and overcoats, jerseys; knitwear, namely knit shirts and sweaters; jeans, clothing of leather, namely coats, belts, pants, jackets; clothing for gymnastics, namely gym shorts, suits and shoes; bathrobes and beachwear; underwear and lingerie, namely vests, underpants, brassieres, petticoats, camisoles, flannel underwear, bodices, bustiers, corsets, morning gowns, night-gowns, mantillas; coats; frocks; waterproof clothing ,namely jackets, hats and pants; trench coats; jackets; trousers; skirts; dresses; waistcoats; shirts; T-shirts; pullovers;cardigans; blouses; shorts; Bermuda shorts; smocks; overalls; school uniforms; working clothes, namely pants, shirts, shoes and boots; socks; footwear, namely shoes, boots, slippers, galoshes and structural or replacement parts thereof; sports shoes and tips for sports shoes; accessories for shoes, namely soles, heel pieces for shoes, uppers for leather shoes, holsters; headgear, namely hoods, caps, undershirts, triangular diapers of cloth; finished textile linings for garments; nylon underpants; suspenders; sarongs; collars; collar protectors; bandanas; garters, namely ankle garters and garter belts; belts; neckties; bow-ties; scarves; muffs; gloves; shawls; cuffs; headbands; veils; wristbands | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |