Drawing for G-POWER

USPTO serial 79025038

G-POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G-POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Headlights, as automobile accessoriesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Motor vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Construction; repair and reconditioning of motor vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 9, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance