Drawing for SWEETCHARITY CHANGING LIVES, ONE CHILD AT A TIME

USPTO serial 79025066

SWEETCHARITY CHANGING LIVES, ONE CHILD AT A TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWEETCHARITY CHANGING LIVES, ONE CHILD AT A TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activitiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 17, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 22, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 27, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance