USPTO serial 79025069
DISTIXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3318515Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DISTIXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
NL-2495 AX Den Haag, NL
NL
NL-2629 HG Delft, NL
NL-2629 HG Delft, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | RUBBER AND GOODS MADE THEREOF, NAMELY, FLANGE PROTECTORS, LIDS, CAPS AND STOPPERS FOR VALVES, PUMPS, FLANGES, PIPES, PIPELINES AND PIPE INSTALLATIONS; RUBBER AND PLASTIC PROTECTION DISCS FOR FLANGES; RUBBER AND PLASTIC SEALING CAPS AND LIDS FOR FLANGES, FACING PROTECTORS NAMELY, FLANGE PROTECTORS, INSULATING CAPS AND LIDS FOR FLANGES; RUBBER AND PLASTIC AS SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF TUBES, PIPES, LIDS, CAPS AND FACING PROTECTORS, NAMELY, FLANGE PROTECTORS; FLEXIBLE PIPES NOT OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OFFERS & MULDER v.o.f.
- Other trademarks owned by DISTIXX Lease B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DISTIXX v.o.f.
- Other trademarks owned by OFFERS & MULDER v.o.f.
- Other trademarks owned by OFFERS & MULDER v.o.f.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DISTIXX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |