USPTO serial 79025078
KINELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3240115Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
08236 ELLEFELD, DE
Other trademarks owned by ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
08236 ELLEFELD, DE
Other trademarks owned by ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
08236 ELLEFELD, DE
Other trademarks owned by ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Bruce Hamburg
C BRUCE HAMBURG Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, PA875 Third Avenue, 8th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Baby food, namely fruit and vegetable juices; ready to drink infant food based on fruits or vegetables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ACKERMANNS HAUS "FLÜSSIGES OBST"; GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named KINELLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |