Drawing for ROBOBEL

USPTO serial 79025102

ROBOBEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3531109Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2008
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ROBOBEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Painting machines, namely, robotic spray painters for industrial use, paint atomizers for industrial use, industrial painting units comprised of robotic spray painters, paint atomizers, electronic controllers, electromechanical controls, and high-voltage generators; replacement parts for the aforesaid painting machines; accessories for painting machines, namely, high voltage generators, paint supply cartridges, sold empty for use with industrial painting machines, and fittings for rotary paint atomizers in the nature of rotary paint atomizer headsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 28, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 9, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 19, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Feb 17, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 15, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 4, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 5, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance