USPTO serial 79025172
PARAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3431355Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2008
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal building material, namely, metal masts; flexible and non-flexible pipes and tubes of metal; pipe muffs of metal; metal buildings, namely, transportable buildings of metal; prefabricated buildings of metal; partly wrought common metals, namely, ingots of common metal; steel sheets; fasteners of metal, namely bolts, nuts, nails, rivets, screws; metal building materials, namely, wall mounts for flexible arms, poles, holders and canopies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | parasols, parasols for use against rain and wind, parasol bases; parasol handles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metal building materials, namely, non-metallic masts; transportable non-metallic buildings, prefabricated non-metallic buildings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leleu, Peter
- Other trademarks owned by Leleu, Peter
- Other trademarks owned by Leleu, Peter
- Other trademarks owned by UMBROSA NV
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PARAFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |