Drawing for BERENTZEN

USPTO serial 79025195

BERENTZEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3230062Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERENTZEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrin Lewertoff and Michael A. Grow

Katrin Lewertoff and Michael A. Grow Ferdinand IP, LLC129 Post Road EastWestport, CT 06880UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032[ Beers; mineral and aerated waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely liqueursSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 17, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 25, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 6, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 6, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 21, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance