Drawing for LUCRO

USPTO serial 79025202

LUCRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258949Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LUCRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEWART J. BELLUS

STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic articles, namely, orthopaedic shoes, boots, soles, innersoles and orthopaedic supports, and orthopaedic supports in the form of cores [ ; implants of artificial materials ]ACTIVE—
025FootwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 5, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 14, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 26, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 12, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 12, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Sep 12, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 12, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 6, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 15, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 15, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Oct 15, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 15, 2012A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 5, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2012ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Aug 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance