USPTO serial 79025207
FASTDAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3496102Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2008
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASTDAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-8600 Dübendorf, CH
CH-8600 Dübendorf, CH
CH-8600 Dübendorf, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BASSAM N. IBRAHIM
BASSAM N. IBRAHIM BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PCP.O. BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR TRANSLATING BINARY DATA INTO MACHINE CODE, USED IN THE FIELDS OF COMMUNICATION BY FIXED AND MOBILE TELEPHONES, HOME MULTIMEDIA, MACHINE-TO-MACHINE COMMUNICATION AND CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND WIRELESS BROADBAND COMMUNICATION SERVICES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |