Drawing for STUBBI

USPTO serial 79025219

STUBBI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3382061Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2008
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUBBI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

CAROLE F. BARRETT HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather; imitation leather; animal skins and hides; drawstring pouches, felt pouches, leather pouches; bags and pouches for discarding chewing gum and other waste made predominantly of leather, imitation leather, felt, fabric, canvas or vinylSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Waste disposal containers and receptacles for household use for discarding chewing gum and other wasteSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 21, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 19, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 10, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 25, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance