Drawing for RESOUND PIXEL

USPTO serial 79025222

RESOUND PIXEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3216055Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESOUND PIXEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna W. Manville, Esq.

Anna W. Manville, Esq. ARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 Twelfth Street, NWIP DOCKETINGWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Hearing aids and parts and accessories thereto not included in other classes, namely remote controls, shells, ear pieces, domes, coils, bone probes, compressors, stabilizers, amplifiers, face plates, and sound feedback suppression unitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 4, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 27, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance