CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ERMITAGE

USPTO serial 79025233

ERMITAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505415Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ERMITAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Visser

Michelle L. Visser Fishman Stewart PLLC39533 Woodward Ave., Ste. 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheeses; milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; [ yogurts; ] [ cream; ] [ milk beverages, namely, milk based beverages containing fruit juice, milk beverages containing fruits, milk beverages with high milk content, milk-based beverage containing coffee, soy-based food beverage used as milk substitute; butter; margarine; buttercream; eggs; meat; fish; poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; fruit jellies; jams; crystallized fruits; compotes; preserved fruits; edible oils and fats; canned meat, fish, fruits and vegetables; pickles; ] pre-cooked dishes consisting primarily of cheese [, vegetable, fish or meat ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 19, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 14, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 5, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 16, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 1, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 25, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 25, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 25, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 9, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 5, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance