USPTO serial 79025264
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner, Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries
John Clarke Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal building materials, namely, metal profiles, metal pipes, metal plates, sheet metal plates, metal foils, metal windows, metal portals, namely, metal doors, metal gates, metal shutters, metal wickets, and metal doorway barriers; metal panels, namely, metal wainscots, metal sheathing, metal coverings, metal wall panels, metal molding, metal casing and metal hinges, metal window frames; metal facades for buildings, houses, and industrial structures, metal building materials for constructing roofs, namely, metal shingles, metal roof trusses, metal rafters, metal trellis, metal roofing tiles; prefabricated buildings in the nature of conservatories primarily out of metal; metal window frames; prefabricated metal parts for doors, windows, facades, canopies, gazebos, roofs, and prefabricated buildings in the nature of conservatories, namely, metal profiles, metal tubes, metal gussets, metal connectors, prefabricated metal roofs and metal cantilever roofs comprised primarily of metal frames, metal awnings, and metal profiles, metal opening and closing devices for windows and doors; metal hinges, metal spring-loaded catches for windows, hatches, wickets and doors, metal armatures, metal cover profiles for windows, window frames, doors, door frames, facades and prefabricated buildings in the nature of conservatories, metal facade building systems and metal vertical-horizontal rod systems, consisting primarily of profiles and tubes, gussets, rod and connectors used as supports, metal awnings, and metal window shutters, metal exterior blinds, metal roll shutters for indoor and outdoor use; metal screws, metal nuts, all the aforesaid goods made primarily of metal or metal combined with synthetic material, wood, glass, stone; metal locksmith goods, namely, metal locks, metal armatures, metal braces, metal fittings, and metal hinges | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for production, processing, and installation of facades, profiles, tubes, plates, panels, connectors, pressroom machines, namely, cutting presses, drilling machines, cutters, namely, parting, slitting, and slicing machines; welding machines, namely, electric welding machines, gas welding machines, and laser welding machines; metal clamps used for holding in place parts on machine tool tables, notching machines for tubes, plates, panels, and profiles; shears, namely, shearing and clipping machines, parts of the aforementioned machines in the nature of slide sweeps, drives and electric drives for windows, door wickets, hatches, canopies, and cantilever roofs, drives for blinds, shade devices, and roller shutters; aforementioned goods excluding stump cutters, wood chippers, brush cutters, bulldozers, front end loaders and other machines used for logging or landscaping purposes; aforementioned goods excluding machines for positioning items during assembly, manufacturing, or packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, non-metal profiles, rigid non-metal pipes, non-metal plates; sheets, namely, wood sheets, non-woven textile sheets, and sheet glass for building purposes; non-metal foils, namely, plastic, glass, and rubber foils for buildings, facades, prefabricated buildings in the nature of conservatories, awnings, sunshades, gazebos, houses and industrial structures, non-metal windows, non-metal portals, namely, non-metal doors, non-metal gates, non-metal shutters, non-metal wickets, and non-metal doorway barriers; non-metal panels, namely, non-metal wainscots, non-metal sheathing, non-metal roof coverings, non-metal wall panels, non-metal molding, non-metal door casing, non-metal doors, non-metal facades for buildings, houses, and industrial structures; non-metal building materials for constructing roofs, namely, non-metal roof trusses, non-metal rafters, non-metal trellis; prefabricated buildings in the nature of conservatories not primarily of metal, non-metal window frames, prefabricated non-metal parts for doors, windows, facades, canopies, gazebos, roofs, and prefabricated buildings in the nature of conservatories, namely, non-metal profiles, non-metal tubes, non-metal gussets, non-metal connectors; non-metal canopy roofs and non-metal cantilever roofs comprised primarily of non-metal frames, non-metal awnings and non-metal profiles; non-metal facade building systems and non-metal vertical-horizontal rod systems, consisting primarily of non-metal profiles, and non-metal tubes, non-metal gussets, non-metal rods, and non-metal connectors used as supports; awnings and non-metal window shutters, non-metal exterior blinds and roll shutters for indoor and outdoor use; all of the aforesaid goods made primarily of synthetic material, wood, glass, stone, or a combination of these materials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |