Drawing for Serial No. 79025288

USPTO serial 79025288

Serial No. 79025288

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318520Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with Serial No. 79025288?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER A CHIABOTTI

Peter A. Chiabotti Akerman LLP777 South Flagler DriveSuite 1100 West TowerWest Palm Beach, FL 33401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural, horticultural [ and forestry ] products, namely, seeds [ and grains ]; chemically treated and/or coated seeds; [ natural live plants; ] foodstuffs for animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 24, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 15, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 2, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 6, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 31, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 22, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 22, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance