USPTO serial 79025297
TECOLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3462428Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECOLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sassenberg, DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell D. Orkin, Reg. No. 25363
Russell D. Orkin, Reg. No. 25363 The Webb Law Firm P.C.420 Ft. Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Printed paper for the coating of the end surfaces or edges of wood or plastic furniture, interiors of buildings, vehicles and ships, all of which are for use in the furniture, automobile and shipbuilding industries ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Plastic foils and continuous pressure laminate foils consisting primarily of plastic, not for packaging, with or without a metal layer for application to a substrate, for use in the furniture, automobile and shipbuilding industries | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | [ Plastic veneers for use in construction of ships ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BauschLinnemann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BauschLinnemann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BauschLinnemann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BauschLinnemann GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named TECOLAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |