Drawing for RENOLIT EXTERIOR

USPTO serial 79025338

RENOLIT EXTERIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324806Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENOLIT EXTERIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa

Mark Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Plastic films other than for packaging for the protection and surface design of exterior building components; Plastics in the form of sheets, films [, blocks, rods, and tubes ] for the design of surfaces of building components such as doors, windows, fences, fronts of buildingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 4, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 22, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2019INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 2, 2018A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2018ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 201771AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 27, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 12, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 19, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance